Morphological and Morphometric Variations of the Glenoid Cavity of the Human Scapula: A Descriptive Osteometric Study

Authors

  • Nilesh S. Rakate Professor, Department of Anatomy, RKDF Medical College, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India Author
  • V. M. Gajbhiye Professor and Head, Department of Anatomy, RKDF Medical College, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India Author

Keywords:

Glenoid cavity, Glenoid cavity index, Morphometry, Scapula, Shoulder arthroplasty

Abstract

Background: The glenoid cavity varies considerably in outline and dimensions. Knowledge of this variation is important for shoulder arthroplasty, the management of recurrent glenohumeral instability and the design of glenoid prosthetic components, particularly in populations with limited normative data. Methods: Sixty dry, intact adult human scapulae of unknown age and sex (30 right, 30 left) were examined. The shape of the glenoid cavity was classified by macroscopic inspection as pear-shaped, inverted comma-shaped or oval, based on the configuration of the anterior margin and the glenoid notch. The supero-inferior (height) and antero-posterior (width) diameters were measured with a digital vernier caliper, and the glenoid cavity index (width/height × 100) was calculated. Right and left sides were compared with the independent-samples Student t-test. Results: The glenoid cavity was pear-shaped in 27 specimens (45%), inverted comma-shaped in 21 (35%) and oval in 12 (20%). The mean supero-inferior diameter was 36.42 ± 2.65 mm on the right and 35.81 ± 2.48 mm on the left (p = 0.36); the mean antero-posterior diameter was 25.24 ± 2.10 mm and 24.65 ± 1.95 mm, respectively (p = 0.26). The glenoid cavity index was similar on the two sides (69.3% right, 68.8% left). Conclusion: The pear shape was the most common variant, and the inverted comma shape was more frequent than in most other Indian series. Glenoid dimensions did not differ significantly between sides and lie within the range reported for other Indian populations. These data provide a regional osteometric reference for shoulder arthroplasty planning and glenoid prosthesis design.

References

Mamatha T, Pai SR, Murlimanju BV, Kalthur SG, Pai MM, Kumar B. Morphometry of glenoid cavity. Online J Health Allied Sci. 2011;10(3):7.

Izquierdo R, Voloshin I, Edwards S, Freehill MQ, Stanwood W, Wiater JM, et al. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons clinical practice guideline on: the treatment of glenohumeral joint osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93(2):203-5. doi:10.2106/00004623-201101190-00012

Franceschi F, Giovannetti de Sanctis E, Gupta A, Athwal GS, Di Giacomo G. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty: state-of-the-art. J ISAKOS. 2023;8(5):306-17. doi:10.1016/j.jisako.2023.05.007

Hasan SS, Leith JM, Campbell B, Kapil R, Smith KL, Matsen FA 3rd. Characteristics of unsatisfactory shoulder arthroplasties. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002;11(5):431-41. doi:10.1067/mse.2002.125806

Paul S, Arora M, Das L, et al. Average Indian glenoid sizes are smaller than all commercially available glenoid components: a systematic review. Indian J Orthop. 2023;57:1008-22. doi:10.1007/s43465-023-00885-8

Indian Council of Medical Research. National ethical guidelines for biomedical and health research involving human participants. New Delhi: ICMR; 2017.

Churchill RS, Brems JJ, Kotschi H. Glenoid size, inclination, and version: an anatomic study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2001;10(4):327-32. doi:10.1067/mse.2001.115269

Altman DG. Practical statistics for medical research. London: Chapman & Hall; 1991.

Joshi M, Pakhale SV. Morphological study of glenoid cavity of scapula. Indian J Clin Anat Physiol. 2023;10(1):46-51. doi:10.18231/j.ijcap.2023.010

Kataria SK, Shekhawat M, Gehlot K, Goyal S. Morphological and morphometric study of glenoid cavity and its clinical application in Western Rajasthan population. Int J Health Clin Res. 2022;5(2):232-4.

Singh A, Singh A, Agarwal P, Gupta R. A morphological and morphometric study of glenoid fossa of scapula and its implication in shoulder arthroplasty. Int J Anat Radiol Surg. 2019;8(3):AO06-AO09. doi:10.7860/IJARS/2019/41437:2487

Vaishnani H, Jethva K, Rathwa A, Sharma P. Morphometry and morphology of glenoid cavity of scapula. Int J Anat Res. 2018;6(1.1):4798-802. doi:10.16965/ijar.2017.467

Akhtar MJ, Kumar B, Fatima N, Kumar V. Morphometric analysis of glenoid cavity of dry scapulae and its role in shoulder prosthesis. Int J Res Med Sci. 2016;4(7):2770-6. doi:10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20161948

Itoi E. Pathophysiology and treatment of atraumatic instability of the shoulder. J Orthop Sci. 2004;9(2):208-13. doi:10.1007/s00776-003-0748-1

Pieper HG. Humeral torsion in the throwing arm of handball players. Am J Sports Med. 1998;26(2):247-53. doi:10.1177/03635465980260021401

Downloads

Published

30-06-2026

Issue

Section

Original Research Article

How to Cite

Morphological and Morphometric Variations of the Glenoid Cavity of the Human Scapula: A Descriptive Osteometric Study. (2026). VIMS JOURNAL OF HEALTH RESEARCH AND INNOVATIONS, 1(1), 20-26. https://www.vjhri.com/index.php/home/article/view/21